[rafalopez]

However I have tried 2 situations.

1. Task, with 15 pilot in goal, pilot “A” side 82 seconds before start point, the pilot “B” part-time, fly slower.
Pilot “A” flying 44,300 meters at 21.5 km / h pilot “B” flying 44,500 meters at 20.8 km / h.
However Pilt “A” score that gets better who did more distance and respect start point, JG use factor 15.

2.: Evidence Similarly, without pilots in goal (the goal change): pilot “A” side 82 seconds before start point, the pilot “B” part-time, fly slower
Pilot “A” flying 44,300 meters 21.5 km / h pilot “B” flying 44,500 meters, 20.8 km / h.
However Pilt “A” gets best score that anyone who makes more distance and respect start point.

I agree with you. if there are no pilots in goal, 1 pilot departed before start point can win the test, but must win by far to do so, the JG current speculation and allows tactical use, even with values> 15.

We have a great discussion on whether or not to use JG
These 2 cases were tested and we believe that is why not use it, many pilots believe that if a pilot has used the JG tactically should have a greater difference in distance and speed to beat a pilot who respect start point.

I am happy that you understand the translation.

thank you very much for your post.

Rafa Lopez, Argentine’s ScoreKeeper.

PD: I conducted new tests on competcion task 2007 and sends the database.

[rafalopez]

Hello, I do not know if anyone has read my message or do not understand my poor English.

The question is:
is not desirable that the JG penalized total points earned by the pilot, affecting also the points for distance?
It is desirable that if 2 pilots equalise in the distance Pilt who departed before the start point gain far fewer points than who respect the timetable?

[rafalopez]

Very good idea Durval … greatly facilitate our work, integrates several gps in 1 single interface.
TEST interface next week

[rafalopez]

The problem is that FS does not verify $ custom_pilot_attribute_name
Only verifies $ custom_pilot_attribute_value
If value is similar in different ranks equal $ custom_pilot_attribute_name
Please check with 2 different attributes but their similar values.

Apologized for our poor English

Hector Zoia & Rafa Lopez
Scorekeeper – ARG

[rafalopez]

Two problems:
Classification filtered by attributes not worked properly:
1 .- Position negative in some pilots
2 .- Not correctamnte filters.

Example.
Attribute name: Standard
Atrib. Value: 1

The pilot has atribb value 0

The classification should not enter into, but it does.
The system does not take the attribute name, filters all attributes without verifying his name

Comment:
It is not possible to use 2 or more attributes at the same time
It is not possible to make a list of attributes and values?
Thanks.
Rafa lopez, the other Scorekeeper – ARG

[rafalopez]

Ok. Verified works.
Results similar to RACE + COMPEGPS

[rafalopez]

Daniel apology did not see your ticket, also believes a ticket for this problem.
The case with classification time of arrival at goal.
Pd: apologized for my bad English

[Author]

Posts